Oregon’s new right to repair law bans ‘parts pairing’ in defiance of Apple

A man repairs a broken phone display in Hoi An, Vietnam.
Oregon passed a law banning "parts pairing."
Pascal Deloche—Godong/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

As we reported a week ago, new United Nations data shows that people are creating electronic waste at a rate five times greater than that for e-waste collection and recycling. Well, here’s something that should help the pushback against this alarming, wasteful trend.

Yesterday, Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek signed into law the newest and toughest right-to-repair act in the U.S. This is the fourth such state law in the country, and it goes even further than California’s good effort last October, in particular by resisting Apple’s lobbying and banning the use of “parts pairing” to hinder independent repair services.

Parts pairing is when an electronics manufacturer digitally pairs a component’s serial number to that of the machine it goes into. So, in the case of an iPhone, an Apple-made battery taken from a smashed-up handset can’t simply be swapped into another iPhone that needs it, without triggering scary warning messages about potentially unofficial parts. A swapped-in selfie camera won’t work properly, despite being an official Apple part. Same goes for a screen, which may not be able to have its brightness adjusted, for no good reason.

As the New York Times reported last year, this tactic has made Apple billions of dollars, by steering customers towards the pricey AppleCare insurance policy, under which the company will repair screens and replace batteries. So it’s no surprise that Apple tried to convince Oregon lawmakers not to ban the practice, telling them that the move would “undermine the security, safety, and privacy of Oregonians by forcing device manufacturers to allow the use of parts of unknown origin and consumer devices.”

Well, that didn’t work. Oregon’s Right to Repair Act passed each stage of the legislative process comfortably. For any devices sold after the start of next year, manufacturers won’t be allowed to use parts pairing to reduce a device’s functionality or performance, or to “display misleading alerts or warnings…about unidentified parts,” or to stop any device owner or independent repair business from installing a perfectly functioning part. (Other parts of the law, such as those requiring manufacturers to allow people to fix their own devices, apply to stuff that was sold after mid-2015, or mid-2021 in the case of smartphones specifically.)

“By keeping products running and off the scrap heap, repair cuts waste and saves consumers money,” said Nathan Proctor, right-to-repair campaign chief at the Public Interest Research Group, which aided the campaign for the law in Oregon. “People are tired of not being able to fix things. Lawmakers have gotten the message and, in turn, are sending that message to the manufacturers.” 

Incidentally, while Apple opposed the parts-pairing shift, smartphone rival Google did not. Indeed, its devices operations chief Steven Nickel earlier this year wrote an open letter supporting the bill, saying it “requires that as manufacturers we design products in a manner that enables simple, safe, and correct repairs wherever and by whomever they are done,” adding: “This is what we call design for serviceability.”

More news below. And do make sure to read Jessica Mathews and Allie Garfinkle’s great article on Emad Mostaque’s fall from grace at the now very inappropriately named Stability AI.

David Meyer

Want to send thoughts or suggestions to Data Sheet? Drop a line here.

NEWSWORTHY

Amazon data centers. Amazon will spend $148 billion on data centers over the next 15 years, vastly outstripping such investments (that we currently know about) from Microsoft and Google. Now all Amazon needs is land and electricity, Bloomberg reports. The expansion is partly to do with the predicted explosion in compute demand for AI, but also bread-and-butter stuff like corporate file storage and databases.

Reproductive health care accusations. The abortion provider MSI and the Center for Countering Digital Hate have accused Meta and Google of obstructing legal abortion and reproductive health care information in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. According to the Guardian, the organizations say the Big Tech firms have been blocking ads while also failing to stop misinformation on the subjects that could discourage women from accessing the care they need. Meta is looking into the report, while Google denies its allegations.

Dodgy facial recognition. Israel has been using facial recognition and AI to conduct mass surveillance on people in Gaza, with some people being wrongly identified as being militants as a result. One such example is the Palestinian poet Mosab Abu Toha, who was beaten during an interrogation that soldiers later said was “a mistake.” According to the New York Times, the Israeli army is using technology from a local company called Corsight, as well as the photo search function in Google Photos. It turns out that Corsight’s system struggles with grainy footage and obscured faces.

SIGNIFICANT FIGURES

11.3%

—The drop in Reddit’s share price yesterday, after research firm Hedgeye suggested the company as a short, due to concerns about Reddit’s limited scope for expansion.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

Amazon injects another $2.75 billion into Anthropic, by Bloomberg

Exclusive: Many senior Amazon employees won’t get cash raises this year, by Jason Del Rey

Judge rejects Coinbase’s ‘major questions doctrine’ argument in landmark SEC case, by Leo Schwartz

Robot dog company celebrates its first shooting: ‘We are relieved that the only casualty that day was our robot, by the Associated Press

Trump Social’s public debut puts ‘all other meme stocks to shame,’ veteran analyst says, by Sunny Nagpaul

Ask Andy: How can you tell whether a startup is a good place to work? When is it safe to disclose a mental-health challenge to coworkers?, by Andy Dunn

BEFORE YOU GO

Chief AI officers everywhere. The Biden Administration has told every federal agency to get a chief AI officer, The Verge reports. VP Kamala Harris: “This is to make sure that AI is used responsibly, understanding that we must have senior leaders across our government, who are specifically tasked with overseeing AI adoption and use.” Some agencies, such as the Justice Department, have already hired CAIOs.

This is the web version of Data Sheet, a daily newsletter on the business of tech. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.