Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

U.S., Japan, Philippines condemn Beijing's South China Sea moves in summit

Published 04/11/2024, 05:09 AM
Updated 04/12/2024, 05:01 AM
© Reuters. U.S. President Joe Biden and Japan's Prime Minister Fumio Kishida attend an official State Dinner at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 10, 2024. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

By Jeff Mason, Trevor Hunnicutt and Michael Martina

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Long-simmering tensions between China and its neighbors took center stage on Thursday as leaders of the U.S., Japan and the Philippines met at the White House to push back on Beijing's stepped-up pressure on Manila in the disputed South China Sea.

U.S. President Joe Biden's administration announced new joint military efforts and infrastructure spending in the former American colony while he hosted Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. alongside Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Washington for a first-of-its-kind trilateral summit.

Topping the meeting's agenda was China's increasing pressure in the South China Sea, which has escalated despite a personal appeal by Biden to Chinese President Xi Jinping last year.

"We express our serious concerns about the People’s Republic of China’s dangerous and aggressive behavior in the South China Sea. We are also concerned by the militarization of reclaimed features and unlawful maritime claims in the South China Sea," the countries said in a statement issued after the summit.

China's foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said on Friday the statement amounted to a "wanton smear attack" and Beijing summoned a Japanese diplomat to protest against the comments.

The Philippines and China had several maritime run-ins last month that included the use of water cannon and heated verbal exchanges. The disputes center on the Second Thomas Shoal, home to a small number of Filipino troops stationed on a warship that Manila grounded there in 1999 to reinforce its sovereignty claims.

Launching the White House meeting with the three leaders, Biden affirmed that a 1950s era mutual defense treaty binding Washington and Manila would require the U.S. to respond to an armed attack on the Philippines in the South China Sea.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"United States defense commitments to Japan and to the Philippines are iron clad," he said.

Marcos has successfully pushed Washington to resolve longstanding ambiguity over the treaty by specifying that it would apply to disputes in that sea.

China claims almost the entire South China Sea, including the maritime economic zones of neighboring nations. The Second Thomas Shoal is within the Philippines' 200-mile (320-km) exclusive economic zone. A 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration found that China's sweeping claims have no legal basis.

Japan has a dispute with China over islands in the East China Sea.

The three countries said their coast guards planned to conduct a trilateral exercise in the Indo-Pacific region in the coming year and establish a dialogue to enhance future cooperation.

The moves come after two prominent U.S. senators introduced a bipartisan bill on Wednesday to provide Manila with $2.5 billion to boost its defenses against Chinese pressure.

"China's frequent tactic is to try to isolate the target of its pressure campaigns, but the April 11 trilateral signals clearly that the Philippines is not alone," said Daniel Russel, who served as the top U.S. diplomat for East Asia under former President Barack Obama.

The leaders also unveiled a wide range of agreements to enhance economic ties during the meetings, including backing new infrastructure in the Philippines, aimed at ports, rail, clean energy and semiconductor supply chains.

Latest comments

said Daniel Russel, who served as the top U.S. diplomat for East Asia under former President Barack Obama. ////Two people who haven't been in an official seat in many years. Who's actually running the country?
urrr, the article just quoted him for one sentence....calm down
the article quoted one sentence from Daniel Russel, so you immediately jumped into the conclusion that he is part of some shadow govt? you really need to stop reading Q websites and get out of your basement….
IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!!
did he take him behind the wood shed? pathetic president
pathetic Russian troll
what exactly is Mark complaining/ranting about now???
China needs a reality check
The U.S. plans a Coast Guard joint patrol in the Indo-Pacific region in the coming year.........Coast Guard? Why not the Navy? The Coast Guard is supposed to be for home affairs.
US Navy's 7th fleet has always been in the Asia Pacific, nothing has changed, but feel free to keep ranting
It's referring to the Philippines' Coast Guard, obviously, joined by the US Navy.
The policeman of the world is only good at ganging up. Ganging up on Russia, ganging up on North Korea, ganging up on China. It is a well established pattern. Look at the war on Iraq, it was the coalition of the willing against a weak Iraq. The same with Afghaniistan, during Korean war, Vietnam war, the list is long.
* Ganging up on Russia* - yeah poor Vlad, such an innocent victim, somebody please stops Biden the bully picking on him!
*The same with Afghaniistan* - yes, how can the big nasty US attack the innocent Taliban and Osama after 9-11?
It was bound to happen if you really understand what dirty hands US is playing all around the world.
This report is bias and deceitful. It did not explain the history of the South China Sea and China's legitimate sovereignty claim over a large swath of the South China Sea. By the way, “the South China Sea arbitration was a political farce manipulated by the U.S. in the name of the law with the U.S. pulling strings behind the scenes.” China did not participate in the arbitration and NEVER agree / accept rulings. After end of WW2 in 1945, it was stated in the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations that the armed forces of the Republic of China government at Nanjing accepted the surrender of the Japanese garrisons in Taiwan, including the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Nanjing then declared that both Paracel and Spratly Islands archipelagos to be part of Guangdong Province. US was the main participant of the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations and the leading superpower after WW2. The Declaration also stipulated that Japan must returned all occupied territories including Taiwan and Diaoyu Islands to China. As a matter of fact, old atlases such as Philips Maps & Atlases published in the UK clearly indicates that Spratly and Paracel Islands are Chinese territories with the word (China) in parenthesis. I kept a copy of the old Philip Atlas which I used for my high school Geography lessons during the 1960s.
china said their ancestor pass by south china sea, is it a stupid reason to claim over it?
and i know china got huge IT army to say bs everywhere, stop it, your bs only work in your dictator country
After end of WW2 in 1945, it was stated in the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations that the armed forces of the Republic of China government at *Nanjing accepted the surrender of the Japanese garrisons in Taiwan, including the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Nanjing then declared that both Paracel and Spratly Islands archipelagos to be part of Guangdong Province. * - interesting, but of course we all know that same Republic of China govt is now the government in Taiwan, so technically, if you want to stick with historical rights, Taiwan should have the legitimate sovereignty claim then.....
Biden please stop stir things up to create war..
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.