ARTS

National Portrait Gallery had ‘no evidence’ for art dealer’s slavery link

Bosses forced to admit error after being contacted by Edward Fox White’s great-great-grandson
The National Portrait Gallery in London claimed Edward Fox White had benefited from compensation given out after the abolition of slavery
The National Portrait Gallery in London claimed Edward Fox White had benefited from compensation given out after the abolition of slavery
ALAMY

The National Portrait Gallery wrongly said that an art dealer built his career using money from slavery before having to concede there was no evidence for the claim.

A painting of Edward Fox White, who opened his first picture gallery in Glasgow in 1854, had been accompanied by a caption which stated that he had benefited from a compensation payout received by his father-in-law following the abolition of slavery.

Curators had written that the money paid to Moses Gomes Silva, a Jamaican sugar plantation owner, was used to “establish and sustain” White’s career. However, they backtracked on the claim after it was spotted by Donald Gajadhar, White’s great-great-grandson.

Slavery notice to be placed with statue of Guy’s Hospital founder

He said that the gallery