The Standard View: The Tories' mayoral selection process was a dereliction of duty to Londoners

Susan Hall and Sadiq Khan
Tory mayoral candidate Susan Hall was defeated by incumbent Labour mayor Sadiq Khan in last week’s City Hall election
PA
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

When this newspaper endorsed Sadiq Khan for a third term as London’s Mayor, it was not simply because of who he was not: Susan Hall. The Evening Standard believes that Khan was the best candidate, and Londoners agreed by a significant margin. Yet it is difficult to escape from the conclusion that the Tories bungled their mayoral selection, to the detriment of the contest as a whole.

Today, the Standard reveals the full story of how the Conservatives spectacularly failed to deny Khan another four years at City Hall, instead handing the Mayor a swing from Tory to Labour of 3.2 per cent and a lead in votes totalling more than 275,000.

Party insiders blame everything, from infighting and the lack of a positive message, to the decision not to abandon and restart the search for a mayoral candidate. Perhaps most remarkable — but ultimately unsurprising, given the end result — was the accusation that amateur “party apparatchiks” were put in charge of the shortlisting of candidates.

It all reinforces what many Londoners already suspected. That the Conservatives have lost interest in the capital. This is more than an electoral mistake, given that the city is home to nine million people and 75 parliamentary constituencies, up two from the last election. It is also a dereliction of duty by one of the great parties of the democratic world.

Good news on growth

A collector’s item for those who follow Office for National Statistics releases closely — the UK economy has surprised on the upside. GDP grew by a stronger than expected 0.6 per cent in the first quarter of this year, well and truly ending the shallow recession at the end of 2023.

This will be welcome news for the Prime Minister and Chancellor, whose economic message now appears to be that the economy has turned a corner, and voters should stick with the plan. Yet it is also a positive development for the Leader of the Opposition.

Timing is everything in politics, and if the polls are correct, Sir Keir Starmer looks set to enter No 10 later this year just as interest rates start to fall and the economy comes back to life.

Mamma Mia! 

It is a good news-bad news situation. On the one hand, this weekend’s Eurovision Song Contest held in Sweden marks 50 years since Abba stunned the world with their rendition of Waterloo.

On the other, that would make 1974 half a century ago  — a statistic which, like quarterly GDP figures, must surely be subject to revision. 

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in