Former President Trump has asked a judge to throw out his criminal hush money conviction, based on the Supreme Court's recent presidential immunity ruling.
The Supreme Court's majority opinion in the presidential immunity case is a stark example of cherry-picking text and history, which could threaten democracy itself.
The Chevron doctrine was never meant to become, as it sometimes has over time, an invitation for agencies to implement agendas that extend beyond the law.
Experts say a sweeping Supreme Court decision will force Congress and the next president to work more closely together and stop relying on the 'faceless leviathan' of federal agencies.
How the SCOTUS NetChoice ruling on social media platforms' First Amendment rights could affect a host of tech legislation, including kids' online safety laws — Here's what the SCOTUS decision might mean for everything from kids online…
The stakes for Democrats in their extraordinary public schism over whether President Joe Biden should withdraw from the 2024 presidential race extend far beyond the White House. A decisive loss at the top of the ticket could cost Democrats…
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announced legislation aimed at removing immunity protections from former President Trump by classifying his behavior following the 2020 election "unofficial."
The First Amendment still imposes some limits on the government’s ability to control what content appears online. On July 1, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton, two critical…
The U.S. Supreme Court has crossed the line. It is no longer a legal body; it is a political body imposing a radical agenda. It has dismantled administrative practices that protect health and safety, endangered women’s health, removed key…
After President Biden criticized the Supreme Court for its ruling favoring former President Trump's arguments for presidential immunity, experts weighed on the precedence of it.